Section 3
Save Endangered Language
"Obviously we must do some
serious rethinking of our priorities, lest linguistics go down in history as the only science that
presided obviously over the disappearance of 90 percent of the very field to which
it is dedicated." - Michael Krauss, “The World’s Languages in Crisis”.
|
A
|
Ten
years ago Michael Krauss sent a shudder through the discipline of
linguistics with his
prediction that half the 6,000 or so languages spoken in the world would
cease to be uttered
within a century.
Unless
scientists and community leaders directed a worldwide effort to stabilize
the decline of local languages, he
warned, nine tenths of the linguistic diversity of humankind would probably be doomed to
extinction. Krauss’s prediction was little more than an educated guess, but other respected
linguists had been clanging out similar alarms. Keneth
L. Hale of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology noted in the same
journal issue that eight languages on which
he had done fieldwork had since passed into extinction.
A 1990 survey in Australia found that 70 of the 90 surviving Aboriginal languages were no longer used
regularly by all age groups. The same was true for all but 20 of the 175 Native American
languages spoken or remembered in the US, Krauss told a congressional panel in 1992.
|
B
|
Many
experts in the field mourn the loss of rare languages, for several reasons.
To start, there is scientific
self-interest: some of the most basic questions in linguistics have to do with the limits of human
speech, which are far from fully explored. Many researchers would like to know which structural
elements of grammar and vocabulary—if anyare truly universal
and probably therefore hardwired into the human brain. Other scientists try
to reconstruct ancient migration
patterns by comparing borrowed words that appear in otherwise
unrelated languages. In each of these cases, the wider the portfolio of languages you study, the more likely
you are to get the right answers.
|
C
|
Despite
the near constant buzz in linguistics about endangered languages over the past 10 years, the field has
accomplished depressingly little. “You would think that there would be some organized response to
this dire situation”,
some attempt to determine which
language can be saved and which should be documented before they disappear, says Sarah G. Thomason, a linguist at
the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. “But there isn’t
any such effort organized in the profession. It is only recently that it
has become fashionable enough to work on
endangered languages.55 Six years ago, recalls Douglas H. Whalen of Yale University, “when I
asked linguists who was raising money to deal with these
problems, I mostly got blank stares.” So Whalen and a few other linguists
founded the Endangered Languages Fund. In the
five years to 2001 they were able to collect only $80,000
for research grants. A similar foundation in England, directed by Nicholas
Ostler, has raised just $8,000 since 1995.
|
D
|
But
there are encouraging signs that the field has turned a comer. The
Volkswagen Foundation, a German charity, just
issued its second round of grants totaling more than $2 million. It has created a
multimedia archive at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
in the Netherlands that can house recordings, grammars, dictionaries and other data on endangered
languages. To fill the archive, the foundation has dispatched
field linguists to document Aweti (100 or so speakers in Brazil) , Ega (about 300
speakers in Ivory Coast), Waimaa (a few hundred speakers in East Timor),
and a dozen or so other languages unlikely
to survive the century. The Ford Foundation has also
edged into the arena. Its contributions helped to reinvigorate a
master-apprentice program
created in 1992 by Leanne Hinton of Berkeley and Native Americans worried about the imminent demise of about 50
indigenous languages in California. Fluent speakers
receive $3,000 to teach a younger relative (who is also paid) their native
tongue through 360 hours of shared
activities, spread over six months. So far about 5 teams have completed the program, Hinton
says, transmitting at least some knowledge of 25 languages.
“It’s too early to call this language revitalization,” Hinton admits. “In
California the death rate of elderly speakers
will always be greater than the recruitment rate of young speakers. But at least we prolong the
survival of the language•” That will give linguists more
time to record these tongues before they vanish.
|
E
|
But
the master-apprentice approach hasn’t caught on outside the U.S., and
Hinton’s effort is a drop in the sea. At least
440 languages have been reduced to a mere handful of
elders, according to the Ethnologue, a catalogue of languages produced by
the Dallasbased group SIL International that comes closest to global coverage.
For the vast majority of
these languages, there is little or no record of their grammar, vocabulary,
pronunciation or use in
daily life. Even if a language has been fully documented, all that remains
once it vanishes from active use is a
fossil skeleton, a scattering of features that the scientist was lucky and astute enough to
capture. Linguists may be able to sketch an outline of the forgotten language and fix its place
on the evolutionary tree, but little more. “How did people
start conversations and talk to babies? How did husbands and wives
converse?” Hinton asks. “Those are the first
things you want to learn when you want to revitalize the language.
|
F
|
But
there is as yet no discipline of “conservation linguistics” as there is for
biology. Almost every strategy tried so far
has succeeded in some places but failed in others, and there seems to be no way to predict
with certainty what will work where. Twenty years ago
in New Zealand, Maori speakers set up “language nests, “in which
preschoolers were immersed
in the native language. Additional Maori-only classes were added as the children progressed through
elementary and secondary school. A similar approach was tried in Hawaii, with some success -
the number of native speakers has stabilized at 1,000 or so, reports Joseph E. Grimes of
SIL International, who is working on Oahu. Students can
now get instruction in Hawaiian all the way through university.
|
G
|
One
factor that always seems to occur in the demise of a language is that the
speakers begin to have collective doubts about
the usefulness of language loyalty. Once they start regarding
their own language as inferior to the majority language, people stop using
it for all situations. Kids pick up on the
attitude and prefer the dominant language. In many cases,
people don’t notice until they suddenly realize that their kids never speak
the language, even at home. This is how
Cornish and some dialects of Scottish Gaelic is still only rarely used for daily home life
in Ireland, 80 years after the republic was founded with Irish as its first official language.
|
I
|
Linguists
agree that ultimately, the answer to the problem of language extinction is multilingualism. Even uneducated
people can learn several languages, as long as they start
as children. Indeed, most people in the world speak more than one tongue,
and in places such as Cameroon (279
languages), Papua New Guinea (823) and India (387) it is common to speak three or four
distinct languages and a dialect or two as well. Most Americans and Canadians, to the west
of Quebec, have a gut reaction that anyone speaking
another language in front of them is committing an immoral act. You get the same reaction in Australia and
Russia. It is no coincidence that these are the areas where languages are disappearing the
fastest. The first step in saving dying languages is to persuade the world’s majorities to
allow the minorities among them to speak with their own
voices.
|
Questions 27-33
The reading
passage has eight paragraphs, A-H
Choose the correct
heading for paragraphs A-H from the list below.
Write the correct
number, i – xi, in boxes 27-33 on your answer sheet.
List of Headings
|
i
|
data
consistency needed for language
|
ii
|
consensus on
an initiative recommendation for saving dying out languages
|
iii
|
positive
gains for protection
|
iv
|
minimum
requirement for saving a language
|
v
|
potential
threat to minority language
|
vi
|
a period when
there was absent of real effort made.
|
vii
|
native
language programs launched
|
viii
|
lack
in confidence in young speakers as a negative factor
|
ix
|
practise
in several developing countries
|
x
|
value
of minority language to linguists.
|
xi
|
government
participation in language field
|
27
|
Paragraph A
|
28
|
Paragraph B
|
29
|
Paragraph D
|
30
|
Paragraph E
|
31
|
Paragraph F
|
32
|
Paragraph G
|
33
|
Paragraph H
|
Questions 34-38
Use the
information in the passage to match the people (listed A-F) with opinions or
deeds below. Write the appropriate letters A-F in boxes 34-38 on your answer
sheet.
A
|
Nicholas
Ostler
|
B
|
Michael
Krauss
|
C
|
Joseph E.
Grimes
|
D
|
Sarah
G. Thomason
|
E
|
Keneth L.
Hale
|
F
|
Douglas
H. Whalen
|
34
|
Reported
language conservation practice in Hawaii
|
35
|
Predicted
that many languages would disappear soon
|
36
|
Experienced
process that languages die out personally
|
37
|
Raised
language fund in England
|
38
|
Not enough
effort on saving until recent work
|
Questions 39-40
Choose the correct
letter, A, B, C or D.
Write your answers
in boxes 39-40 on your answer sheet.
39
|
What
is real result of master-apprentice program sponsored by The Ford
Foundation!
|
A
|
Teach
children how to speak
|
B
|
Revive some
endangered languages in California
|
C
|
Postpone
the dying date for some endangered languages
|
D
|
Increase
communication between students
|
40
|
What
should majority language speakers do according to the last paragraph?
|
A
|
They should
teach their children endangered language in free lessons
|
B
|
They
should learn at least four languages
|
C
|
They should
show their loyalty to a dying language
|
D
|
They
should be more tolerant to minority language speaker
|
|