GIFTED CHILDREN
|
A
|
By the time
Laszlo Polgar’s first baby was born in 1969 he already had firm views on
child-rearing. An eccentric citizen of communist Hungary, he had written a
book called “Bring up Genius!” and one of his favourite sayings was
“Geniuses are made, not born”. An expert on the theory of chess, he
proceeded to teach little Zsuzsa at home, spending up to ten hours a day on
the game. Two more daughters were similarly hot-housed. All three obliged
their father by becoming world-class players. The youngest, Judit, is
currently ranked 13th in the world, and is by far the best female chess
player of all time. Would the experiment have succeeded with a different
trio of children? If any child can be turned into a star, then a lot of
time and money are being wasted worldwide on trying to pick winners.
|
B
|
America has
long held “talent searches”, using test results and teacher recommendations
to select children for advanced school courses, summer schools and other
extra tuition. This provision is set to grow. In his state-of-the-union
address in 2006, President George Bush announced the “American
Competitiveness Initiative”, which, among much else, would train 70,000
high-school teachers to lead advanced courses for selected pupils in
mathematics and science. Just as the superpowers’ space race made Congress
put money into science education, the thought of China and India turning
out hundreds of thousands of engineers and scientists is scaring America
into prodding its brightest to do their best.
|
C
|
The
philosophy behind this talent search is that ability is innate; that it can
be diagnosed with considerable accuracy; and that it is worth cultivating.
In America, bright children are ranked as “moderately”, “highly”,
“exceptionally” and “profoundly” gifted. The only chance to influence
innate ability is thought to be in the womb or the first couple of years of
life. Hence the fad for “teaching aids” such as videos and flashcards for
newborns, and “whale sounds” on tape which a pregnant mother can strap to
her belly.
|
D
|
In Britain,
there is a broadly similar belief in the existence of innate talent, but
also an egalitarian sentiment which makes people queasy about the idea of
investing resources in grooming intelligence. Teachers are often opposed to
separate provision for the best-performing children, saying any extra help
should go to stragglers. In 2002, in a bid to help the able while leaving
intact the ban on most selection by ability in state schools, the
government set up the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth. This
outfit runs summer schools and master classes for children nominated by
their schools. To date, though, only seven in ten secondary schools have
nominated even a single child. Last year all schools were told they must
supply the names of their top 10%.
|
E
|
Picking
winners is also the order of the day in ex-communist states, a hangover
from the times when talented individuals were plucked from their homes and
ruthlessly trained for the glory of the nation. But in many other
countries, opposition to the idea of singling out talent and grooming it
runs deep. In Scandinavia, a belief in virtues like modesty and social
solidarity makes people flinch from the idea of treating brainy children
differently.
|
F
|
And in Japan,
there is a widespread belief that all children are born with the same
innate abilities – and should, therefore, be treated alike. All are taught
together, covering the same syllabus at the same rate until they finish
compulsory schooling. Those who learn quickest are expected then to teach
their classmates. In China, extra teaching is provided, but to a
self-selected bunch. “Children’s palaces” in big cities offer a huge range
of after-school classes. Anyone can sign up; all that is asked is excellent
attendance.
|
G
|
Statistics
give little clue as to which system is best. The performance of the most
able is heavily affected by factors other than state provision. Most state
education in Britain is nominally non-selective, but middle-class parents
try to live near the best schools. Ambitious Japanese parents have made
private, out-of-school tuition a thriving business. And Scandinavia’s
egalitarianism might work less well in places with more diverse populations
and less competent teachers. For what it’s worth, the data suggest that
some countries – like Japan and Finland, see table – can eschew selection
and still thrive. But that does not mean that any country can ditch selection
and do as well.
|
H
|
Mr Polgar
thought any child could be a prodigy given the right teaching, an early
start and enough practice. At one point he planned to prove it by adopting
three baby boys from a poor country and trying his methods on them. (His
wife vetoed the scheme.) Some say the key to success is simply hard graft.
Judit, the youngest of the Polgar sisters, was the most driven, and the
most successful; Zsofia, the middle one, was regarded as the most talented,
but she was the only one who did not achieve the status of grandmaster.
“Everything came easiest to her,” said her older sister. “But she was
lazy.”
|
Questions 28-33
Do the following statements agree with
the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 28-33 on your answer sheet,
write
YES
|
if the
statement is true
|
NO
|
if the
statement is false
|
NOT GIVEN
|
if the information is not
given in the passage
|
28
|
America has a long history of selecting talented students into
different categories.
|
29
|
Teachers and schools in Britain held welcome attitude towards the
government’s selection of gifted students.
|
30
|
Some
parents agree to move near reputable schools in Britain.
|
31
|
Middle-class parents participate in their children’s education.
|
32
|
Japan and
Finland comply with selected student’s policy.
|
33
|
Avoiding-selection-policy only works in a specific environment.
|
Questions 34-35
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or
D.
Write your answers in boxes 34-35 on
your answer sheet.
34
|
What’s Laszlo
Polgar’s point of view towards geniuses of children
|
A
|
Chess is the
best way to train geniuses.
|
B
|
Genius tends to happen on
first child.
|
C
|
Geniuses can
be educated later on.
|
D
|
Geniuses are born naturally.
|
35
|
What is the
purpose of citing Zsofia’s example in the last paragraph
|
A
|
Practice makes genius.
|
B
|
Girls are not
good at chess.
|
C
|
She was an adopted child.
|
D
|
Middle child
is always the most talented.
|
Questions 36-40
Use the information in the passage to
match the countries (listed A-E) with correct connection below.
Write the appropriate letters, A-E, in
boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet.
A
|
Scandinavia
|
B
|
Japan
|
C
|
Britain
|
D
|
China
|
E
|
America
|
36
|
Less gifted children get help from other classmates
|
37
|
Attending extra teaching is open to anyone
|
38
|
People are
reluctant to favor gifted children due to social characteristics
|
39
|
Both views of innate and egalitarian co-existed
|
40
|
Craze of
audio and video teaching for pregnant women.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments