Psychosocial Value of Space
A.
What would a building space look and feel like
if it were designed to promote psychological and social well – being? How would
it affect the senses, the emotions, and the mind? How would it affect behavioural
patterns? For insights, it is useful to look not at buildings, but at zoos. Zoo
design has gone through a radical transformation in the past several decades. Cages
have been replaced by natural habitats and geographic clustering of animals. In
some places, the animals and free – ranging and the visitors are enclosed in
buses or trains moving through the habitat. Animals now exist in mixed species
exhibits more like their natural landscapes. And, as in nature, the animals have
much greater control over their behaviour. They can be on view if they want, or
out of sight. They forage, play, rest, mate and act like normal animals.
B.
What brought about this transformation in
philosophy and design? A key factor was concern over the animals’ psychological
and social well – being. Zoos could keep animals alive, but they couldn’t make
them flourish. Caged animals often exhibit neurotic behaviours – pacing,
repetitive motions, aggression, and withdrawal. In one famous example, an
animal psychologist was hired by the Central Park Zoo to study a polar bear
that spent the day swimming in endless figure eights in its small pool. This was
not normal polar bear behaviour and the zoo was concerned about it. After several
days of observation, the animal psychologist offered a diagnosis. The bear was
bored. To compensate for this unfortunate situation, the zoo added amenities
and toys to the bear’s enclosure to encourage exploration and play.
C.
Are there lessons that we can apply to building
design? Some experts believe so; for example, biologist Stephen Boyden (1971)
defines the optimum healthy environment as ‘the conditions which tend to
promote or permit an animal optimal physiological, mental, and social
performance in its natural or “evolutionary” environment.’ Because humans
evolved in a natural landscape, it is reasonable to turn to the natural
environment for clues about preference patterns that may be applicable to
building design. Drawing on habitat selection theory, ecologist Gordon Orians
argues that humans are psychologically adapted to and prefer landscape features that characterized
the African plain or savannah, the presumed site of human evolution. Although humans
now live in many different habitats, Orians argues that sour species’ long
history as mobile hunter and gatherers on the African savannahs should have
left its mark on our psyche. If the ‘savannah hypothesis’ is true, we would
expect to find that humans intrinsically like and find pleasurable environments
that contain the key features and of the savannah most likely to have aided our
ancestors’ survival and well-being.
D.
Although Boyden distinguishes between survival
and well – being needs, they often overlap. For example, people clearly need
food for survival and health. However, food often serves as the basis for
bonding and relationship development. The ritual of sitting around a fire on
the savannah or in a cave telling stories of the day’s events and planning for
tomorrow may be an ancient carryover from Homo
Sapiens’ hunting and gathering days. According to anthropologist Melvin
Konner, the sense of safety and intimacy associated with the campfire may have
been a factor in the evolution of intellectual progression as well as social
bonds. Today’s hearth is the family kitchen at home, the community places, such
as cafes and coffee bars, where people increasingly congregate to eat, talk,
read and work.
E.
A growing body of research shows that building
environments that connect people to nature are more supportive of human
emotional well – being and cognitive performance than environments lacking
these features. For instance, research by Roger Ulrich consistently shows that
passive viewing of nature through windows promotes positive moods. Similarly,
research by Rachel Kaplan found that workers with window views of trees had a
more positive outlook on life than those doing similar work but whose window
looked onto a parking lot. Connection to natire also provides mini mental
breaks that may aid the ability to concentrate, according to research by
Stephen Kaplan, Terry Hartig and colleagues report similar results in a field
experiment. People in their study who went for a walk in a predominantly
natural setting achieved better on several office tasks requiring concentration
than those who walked in a predominantly built setting or who quietly read a
magazine indoors.
F.
Studies of outdoor landscapes are providing evidence
that the effects of nature on human health and well – being extend beyond
emotional and cognitive functioning to social behaviour and crime reduction. For
instance, Francis Kuo found that outdoor nature buffers aggression in urban
high – rise settings and enhances ability to deal with demanding circumstances.
He also reported that planting trees in urban areas increases sociability by
providing comfortable places for residents to talk with one another and develop
friendships that promote mutual supports.
G.
A natural perspective also contributes important
insights into comfort maintenance. Because people differ from one another in
many ways (genetics, culture, lifestyles) their ambient preferences vary. Furthermore,
a given person varies over time depending upon his or her state of health,
activities, clothing levels, and so forth. For most of human history, people
have actively managed their surroundings as well as their behaviours to achieve
comfort. Yet buildings continue to be designed with a “one size fits all”
approach. Very few buildings or workstations enable occupants to control lighting,
temperature, ventilation rates, or noise conditions. Although the technology is
largely available to do this, the personal comfort systems have not sold well
in the market place, even though research by Walter Kroner and colleagues at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute shows that personal control leads to
significant increases in comfort and morale.
Questions 14 – 20
Reading Passage 2 has seven
paragraphs, A – G.
Choose
the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
Write
the correct number i-x in boxes 14 – 20 on your answer sheet.
14. 14.
Paragraph A
15.
15. Paragraph B
16. 16.
Paragraph C
17. 17.
Paragraph D
18. 18.
Paragraph E
19.
19. Paragraph F
20. 20.
Paragraph G
Questions 21-26
Look at the following people
(questions 21-26) and the list of theories below.
Match
each person with the correct theory, A-I.
Write
the correct letter A-I n boxes 21-26 on your answer sheet.
21.
21. Gordon Orians
22.
22. Melvin Konner
23. 23.
Roger Ulrich
24.
24. Stephen Kaplan
25.
25. Francis Kuo
26. Walter KronnerANSWER KEY
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments