IELTS PRACTICE TEST
READING
WHY RISKS CAN GO WRONG
Human intuition is a bad guide to handling
risk
A. People
make terrible decisions about the future. The evidence is all around, from
their investments in the stock markets to the way they run their businesses. In
fact, people are consistently bad at dealing with uncertainty, underestimating
some kinds of risk and overestimating others. Surely there must be a better way
than using intuition?
B. In
the 1960s, a young American research psychologist, Daniel Kahneman, became
interested in people’s inability to make logical decisions. That launched him
on a career to show just how irrationally people behave in practice. When Kahneman
and his colleagues first started work, the idea of applying psychological
insights to economics and business decisions was seen as rather bizarre. But in
the past decade the fields of behavioural economics have blossomed, and in 2002
Kahneman shared a Nobel Prize in economics for his work. Today he is in demand
by business organisations and international banking companies. But, he says,
there are plenty of institutions that still fail to understand the roots of
their poor decisions. He claims that, far from being random, these mistakes are
systematic and predictable.
C. One
common cause of problems in decision making is over-optimism. Ask most people
about the future, and they will see too much blue sky ahead, even if past
experience suggests otherwise. Surveys have shown that people’s forecasts of
future stock market movements are far more optimistic than past long-term
returns would justify. The same goes for their hopes of ever-rising prices for
their homes or doing well in games of chance. Such optimism can be useful for
managers or sportsmen, and sometimes turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy. But
most of the time it results in wasted effort and dashed hopes. Kahneman’s work
points to three types of over-confidence. First, people tend to exaggerate
their own skill and prowess; in polls, far fewer than half the respondents
admit to having below-average skills in, say, driving. Second, they
overestimate the amount of control they have over the future, forgetting about
luck and chalking up success solely to skill. And third, in competitive pursuits
such as dealing on shares, they forget that they have to judge their skills
against those of the competition.
D. Another
source of wrong decisions is related to the decisive effect of the initial
meeting, particularly in negotiations over money. This is referred to as the “anchor
effect”. Once a figure has been mentioned, it takes a strange hold over the
human mind. The asking price quoted in a house sale, for example, tends to
become accepted by all parties as the “anchor” around which negotiations take
place. Much the same goes for salary negotiations or mergers and acquisitions. If
nobocy has much information to go on, a figure can provide comfort – even though
it may lead to a terrible mistake.
E. In
addition, mistakes may arise due to stubbornness. No one likes to abandon a
cherished belief, and the earlier a decision has been taken, the harder it is
to abandon it. Drug companies must decide early to cancel a failing research
project to avoid wasting money, but may find it difficult to admit they have
made a mistake. In the same way, analysis may have become wedded early to a
single explanation that coloured their perception. A fresh eye always helps.
F. People also tend to put a lot of
emphasis on things they have seen and experienced themselves, which may not be
the best guide to decision-making. For example, somebody may buy an overvalued
share because a relative has made thousands on it, only to get his fingers
burned. In finance, too much emphasis on information close at hand helps to
explain the tendency by most investors to invest only within the country they
live in. even though they know that diversification is good for their
portfolio, a large majority of both Americans and Europeans invest far too
heavily in the shares of their home countries. They would be much better off
spreading their risks more widely.
G. More
information is helpful in making any decision but, says Kahneman, people spend
proportionally too much time on small decisions and not enough on big ones. They
need to adjust the balance. During the boom years, some companies put as much
effort into planning their office party as into considering strategic mergers.
H. Finally,
crying over spilled milk is not just a waste of time; it also often colours
people’s perceptions of the future. Some stock market investors trade far too
frequently because they are chasing the returns on shares they wish they had
bought earlier.
I. Kahneman reckons that some types of
business are much better than others at dealing with risk. Pharmaceutical
companies, which are accustomed to many failures and a few big successes in
their drug-discovery programmes, are fairly relational about their risk-taking.
But banks, he says, have a long way to go. They may take big risks on a few
huge loans, but are extremely cautious about their much more numerous loans to
small businesses, many of which may be less risky than the big ones. And the
research has implications for governments too. They face a whole range of
sometimes conflicting political pressures, which means they are even more
likely to take irrational decisions.
Questions 1-6
Reading Passage 1 has nine paragraphs A-I
Choose the correct heading for Paragraphs B and D-H from the list of
headings below. Write the correct number (i-xi) in boxes 1-6 on your answer
sheet
List
of headings
i. i.
Not identifying the correct
priorities
ii.
ii. A solution for the long term
iii.
iii. The difficulty of changing your
mind
iv.
iv. Why looking back is unhelpful
v. v. Strengthening inner resources
vi. vi. A successful approach to the study
of decision-making
vii. vii. The danger of trusting a global
market
viii.
viii. Reluctance to go beyond the
familiar
ix. ix.
The power of the first number
x. x
The need for more effective risk
assessment
xi. xi. Underestimating the difficulties
ahead
Answer
Example
Paragraph A x
1.
1.Paragraph
B
Paragraph C xi
2. 2. Paragraph
D
3.
3. Paragraph
E
4.
4. Paragraph
F
5. 5. Paragraph
G
6.
6. Paragraph
H
Questions 7-10
Choose the correct answer, A, B,
C or D.
Write your answers in boxes 7-10 on your answer sheet.
7.
People initially found Kahneman’s
work unusual because he
A.
saw mistakes as following
predictable patterns.
B.
was unaware of behavioural
approaches.
C.
dealt with irrational types of
practice.
D.
Applied psychology to finance and
economics.
8.
The writer mentions house-owners’
attitudes towards the value of their homes to illustrate that
A.
past failures may destroy an
optimistic attitude.
B.
people tend to exaggerate their
chances of success.
C.
optimism may be justified in
certain circumstances.
D.
people are influenced by the
success of others.
9.
Stubbornness and inflexibility can
cause problems when people
A.
think their financial difficulties
are just due to bad luck.
B.
avoid seeking advice from experts
and analysts.
C.
refuse to invest in the early
stages of a project.
D.
are unwilling to give up
unsuccessful activities or beliefs.
10. Why
do many Americans and Europeand fail to spread their financial risks when
investing?
A.
They feel safer dealing in a
context which is close to home.
B.
They do not understand the benefits
of diversification.
C.
They are over-influenced by the
successes of their relatives.
D.
They do not have sufficient
knowledge of one another’s countries
Questions 11-13
Answer the questions below,
using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes
11-13 on your answer sheet.
11. Which
two occupations may benefit from being over-optimistic?
12. Which
practical skills are many people over-confident about?
13.
Which type of business has a
generally good attitude to dealing with uncertainty?
ANSWER
KEY
1. 1.
(B) vi
When
Kahneman and his colleagues first started work, the idea of applying
psychological insights to economics and business decision was seen as rather
bizarre. But in the past decade the fields of behavioural finance and
behavioural economics have blossomed, and in 2002 Kahneman shared a Nobel Prize
in economics for his work.
2. 2.
(D) ix
Once
a figure has been mentioned, it takes a strange hold over the human mind
3. 3.
(E) iii
No one likes to
abandon a cherished belief, and the earlier a decision has been taken, the
harder it is to abandon it.
4. 4.
(F) viii
People also tend
to put a lot of emphasis on things they have seen and experienced themselves,
which may not be the best guide to decision – making.
5. 5.
(G) i
People spend
proportionally too much time on small decisions and not enough on big ones.
6. 6.
(H) iv
Crying over
spilled milk is not just a waste of time, it also often colours people’s
perceptions of the future
7. 7.
D
Paragraph B; when
Kahneman and his colleagues first started work, the idea of applying
psychological insights to economics and business decisions was seen as rather
bizarre.
8. 8.
B
Paragraph C; most
people … see too much blue sky ahead, even if past experience suggests otherwise
… people’s forecasts of future stock market movements are … optimistic … the same
goes for their hopes of ever-rising prices for their homes.
9. 9. D
In Paragraph E;
drug companies and analysts are given as examples of people who may be
unwilling to give up one course of action.
10.
10. A
Paragraph F; in
finance, too much emphasis on information close at hand helps to explain the
tendency by most investors to invest only within the country the live in.
11. 11.
managers (and/or) sportsmen
Paragraph
C; Such optimism can be useful for managers or sportsmen, and sometimes turns
into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
12. 12.
driving
Paragraph C; far
fewer than half the respondents admit to having below average skills in say,
driving
13.
13. Pharmaceutical (companies)
Paragraph I; Pharmaceutical
companies, which are accustomed to many failures and a few big successes in
their drug – discovery programmes are fairly rational about their risk- taking.
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments