|
1
|
C This is an inference question. Based on paragraph 1, what does
it say about fire tornados?
Fire
tornadoes—also known as fire whirls, firenados, or fire twisters—look like tornadoes
but are made up of fire. Therefore, they aren’t really tornadoes at all. Tornadoes
are formed when just the right weather elements combine: moist, warm air
lying close to the ground; an unstable atmosphere; and air fronts that
collide and propel moist air vertically into the sky.
In the first sentence,
it says that fire tornadoes look like tornadoes but are made up of fire,
which supports (C). Choice (A) is wrong because the passage says they
aren’t really tornadoes. Choice (B) can be eliminated because the passage
says that fire tornadoes form when “just the right weather elements combine,”
meaning that circumstances have to be exactly right or the fire tornadoes
won’t form at all. Choice (D) is incorrect: an unstable atmosphere is one
contributing factor, but it is not the only one.
|
|
2
|
A This is a vocabulary in context question.
Look at the lines from the passage.
When
hot, strong winds come into contact with an already-burning brushfire, updrafts
of hot air catch the fire and surrounding winds and send it________into the
air. This whirling air forms columns; as more and more hot air is pulled
into a column, the column swirls, very much like a real tornado.
Remember to read a
sentence or two after the word in question. In this case, the description
of the column as it pulls more hot air inside is the key: the column
swirls, supporting (A).
|
|
3
|
C This is a reference question: it’s asking what noun the pronoun zr
replaces. Look at the passage.
A
fire tornado has two parts: the core, which is actually on fire, and an
invisible, rotating air pocket. It can reach temperatures of nearly
2,000°F, which is hot enough to even reignite ashes that have burned out
and then been sucked into the vortex from the ground.
The passage is asking what can reach temperatures of nearly
2,000°F? That would be the fire tornado, or its core. Now do some POE:
(A), (B), and (D) are all mentioned in the passage, but they don’t match
“fire tornado,” so get rid of them.
|
|
4
|
D This is a vocabulary in context question.
Look at the lines from the passage.
It
can reach temperatures of nearly 2,000°F, which is hot enough to
even________ ashes that have burned out and then been sucked into the
vortex from the ground.
Remember to read past
the word in question: “ashes that have burned out” tells us that they’re no
longer burning. “Re” on any word means “again,” and if the ashes have burned
out, this word must mean that the ashes have been lit again. Using POE,
(A), (B), and (C) don’t match this meaning, so (D) will earn the point.
|
|
5
|
D This is a NOT question, which is a
variation on an EXCEPT question. Eliminate everything that is mentioned as
a characteristic of a fire tornado and select the answer choice that is not
mentioned as a characteristic of a fire tornado. Look at the second
paragraph, where the fire tornado is described:
A
fire tornado has two parts: the core, which is actually on fire, and an
invisible, rotating air pocket. It can reach temperatures of nearly
2,000°F, which is hot enough to even reignite ashes that have burned out
and then been sucked into the vortex from the ground. While real tornadoes
occur as a result of atmospheric conditions high above, fire tornadoes
result from hot, dry air rising quickly away from the ground. When hot,
strong winds come into contact with an already-burning brushfire, updrafts
of hot air catch the fire and surrounding winds and send it whirling into
the air. This whirling air forms columns; as more and more hot air is
pulled into a column, the column swirls, very much like a real tornado.
Choices (A), (B), and (C) are all
mentioned, leaving you with (D).
|
|
6
|
A This is a vocabulary in context question.
Look at the lines from the passage.
A
fire twister’s spinning column creates a________thanks to angular momentum.
The law of angular momentum states that when an object is inside a spinning
column it will move faster and faster the closer it gets to the center of
rotation.
The second sentence in
the quote above describes what happens to an object in a spinning column thanks
to the law of angular momentum. The word in question is created by angular
momentum, so the two must be related. Use that to tackle POE. Choice (B) is
angular momentum itself, not what it creates, so eliminate it. Choice (C)
is unrelated to these sentences, so get rid of it too. Choice (D) may be
appealing, but it goes further than necessary—were just talking about the
column that’s been created, not its center. Get rid of (D) and go with (A)!
|
|
7
|
C This question asks you to understand
what the passage says about angular momentum and then find an example that
matches that description. Look at the passage.
The
law of angular momentum states that when an object is inside a spinning
column it will move faster and faster the closer it gets to the center of rotation.
With that description, go to POE and
eliminate answers that don’t describe a spinning motion. Choices (A), (B),
and (D) have nothing to do with spinning or rotating, so eliminate them.
|
|
8
|
C This is a vocabulary in context question.
Look at the lines from the passage.
While
fire whirls move pretty slowly, they can cause significant damage.
Anything—or anyone! —unfortunate enough to be in a fire whirl’s path will
likely either be set ablaze or________from its location. But it’s not just
the fire that’s dangerous—the winds it generates can create wind speeds of
more than 100 mph, which is strong enough to knock down trees.
So the fire whirls move
slowly and it’s the winds that are dangerous. Chances are “flung
vigorously” will have something to do with the wind. Try using POE. Choice (A)
doesn’t have anything to do with wind, so get rid of it. Choice (B) is
tricky: thefire whirl moves slowly, not the objects in its way so get rid
of (B). Choices (C) and (D) both involve throwing something. This may be
where a little bit of common sense is required: if the wind speeds are more
than 100 mph, will the resulting throw be gentle or forceful? Forceful! So
eliminate (D) and go with (C).
|
|
9
|
A This is an inference question, but it doesn’t tell you where to look. Remember
that most questions on TOEFL Reading passages are arranged chronologically
in order with the passage, so you’re probably pretty close to the answer
for this question by looking at where you found the answer to the previous question.
Take a look at that same paragraph.
While
fire whirls move pretty slowly, they can cause significant damage.
Anything—or anyone!—that is unfortunate enough to be in a fire whirl’s path
will likely either be set ablaze or flung vigorously from its location. But
it’s not just the fire that’s dangerous— the winds it generates can create
wind speeds of more than 100 mph, which is strong enough to knock down
trees. Fire whirls also typically don’t last very long, but when they do
they can wreak havoc and leave disaster in their wakes.
Now, look at the answers to see what you
can eliminate. Is there anything in the passage that matches what (A) says?
Not in exactly the same words, but does “move pretty slowly” mean the same thing
as “don’t move quickly?” Yes! So leave (A) for now. Choices (B), (C), and
(D) are exactly the opposite of what this paragraph is saying, so eliminate
them
|
|
10
|
D This is a vocabulary in context question. Look
at the lines from the passage.
But
it’s not just the fire that’s dangerous—the winds it generates can create
wind speeds of more than 100 mph, which is strong enough to knock down
trees. Fire whirls also typically don’t last very long, but when they do
they can__________ and leave disaster in their wakes.
Anytime you you’re not
sure what a word or phrase might mean, you can start by asking yourself if
it is positive or negative in meaning. In this case, the “and” tells us
that the phrase in question will be along the lines of “leave disaster in
their wakes.” That means it’s definitely negative. Use that for POE. Choices
(A) and (D) would be negative, and (B) and (C) are neutral or positive, so
eliminate them. Then, compare (A) and (D): which one is more negative?
Definitely (D)—starting fires is bad, but in turn they cause significant
damage, which is worse.
|
|
11
|
A This is an inference question that guides you to paragraph 5.
There
have been numerous major firenados in the last 150 years, many of which have
proved lethal. In 1871, the great Peshtigo Fire in Northeastern Wisconsin
and Upper Michigan resulted from inauspicious conditions: dry weather
during the summer, slash-and-burn farming practices, and a vigorous cold
front that brought strong winds. Together, these three contributing factors
created firenados that turned a few small prairie fires into a furious
conflagration. The town of Peshtigo, with hundreds of wooden structures and
lumberyards, sat in the middle of a forest of pine and hardwood. When the
fire reached the town, it found abundant fuel. In just minutes, 100-mph
winds and ambient temperatures of more than 700°F caused what is still recognized
as the worst fire disaster in the history of the United States. As best as anyone
could tell, nearly 2,000 people lost their lives.
Once you’ve reviewed the paragraph, it’s
all about POE. Choice (A) is a reasonable match, because the passage says
there have been “numerous major firenados in the last 150 years.” Choice
(B) is out because they have been documented—after all, you know they
happened long before anyone who’s alive today was even born. Choice (C) can
be eliminated because nothing says that the fire in Peshtigo was thefirst
known occurrence of a firenado. Choice (D) is suspicious because it says
“always lethal,” which you can’t prove from the passage.
|
|
12
|
C This is a vocabulary in context question.
Look at the lines from the passage.
There
have been numerous major firenados in the last 150 years, many of which
haveproved lethal. In 1871, the great Peshtigo Fire in Northeastern
Wisconsin and Upper Michigan resulted from inauspicious conditions: dry
weather during the summer, slash-and-burn farming practices, and a vigorous
cold front that brought strong winds. Together, these three contributing
factors created firenados that turned a few small prairie fires into a
furious conflagration.
Looking at the sentence
after the word in question, you see terms like “vigorous” and “strong” that
describe the conditions from which the fire resulted. Together, these tell
you that “inauspicious” means something negative. Try using POE. Choices
(A) and (B) are positive, so eliminate them. Choice (D), “dangerous,” is
negative, and while the conditions did clearly prove to be dangerous, they were
more (C), “unlucky.”
|
|
13
|
This is a summary question that requires you to consider the entire passage.
On a summary question, don’t choose answers that give specific details that
are mentioned only once in the passage. Instead, choose answers that are
broader and are supported throughout the passage. This passage has
discussed how firenadoes are created and the damage they can cause.
Therefore, the three points that show that “A firenado is one example of a
natural phenomenon that is as uncommon as it is dangerous” are as follows:
·
Firenados require a unique combination of
conditions in order to occur. This
answer shows that they are uncommon, because they require a “unique combination”
of conditions.
·
Firenados can cause significant damage. This answer shows that firenados are
dangerous.
·
Scientists don’t know much about
firenados because it is hard to predict where or when they will occur. This answer supports the idea that
firenados are uncommon.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments