Who killed
the Princes in the Tower - the 12-year-old Edward V and his younger
brother? The year is 1483, the place is the grim and/orbidding Tower of
London, and the victims are the two young sons 0/ the late Edward IV.
Suspect number one has always been their uncle Richard, Duke of Gloucester,
the so-called villain of the piece. The boys stood between him and the
throne, and, as one of their closest relatives, he was ideally placed to
arrange their murder. He had both the motive and the opportunity. But did
he do it? Evidence against him is merely circumstantial. What we do know is
that sometime during 1483 the two royal princes disappeared while in the
care of their uncle, and that he immediately assumed the throne, becoming
Richard III. No bodies, no trail 0/ blood, not a shred of proof. But if not
Richard, then who? There was someone else who wanted the crown, someone who
wanted it so much that he was prepared to raise an army and fight Richard
for it. When he became king two years later, he even married the boys'
sister Elizabeth and had their cousin executed, in order to protect himself
from claimants to the throne. His name was Henry Tudor.
1
|
Which phrases in the first
paragraph imply that the writer does not agree with the general
assumption of Richard’s guilt?
|
2
|
In your own words, give two
reasons for suspecting Henry Tudor of the murders.
|
At the Battle
of Bosworth in 1485, Henry Tudor defeated and killed the reigning English
monarch, Richard III, and was subsequently crowned Henry VII. For thirty
years there had been intermittent conflict between two great families, the
houses of York and Lancaster. The Wars of the Roses, as they were known,
were thus brought to an end when Henry, as leader of the Lancastrians,
conquered Richard and his Yorkist supporters. Henry was eager, not only to
impose his authority, but also to keep the peace, and with that in mind he
united the two warring houses by marrying Elizabeth of York. In order to
flatter him, Tudor chroniclers were at pains to disparage his predecessor,
and Richard has therefore gone down in history as a malicious, vengeful
usurper, who murdered his innocent nephews. It is true that Richard never
denied the contemporary rumours of his guilt, and may well have committed
this heinous crime. Neverthless, it seems likely that if he had defeated
Henry at Bosworth, Yorkist historians would have painted a very different
picture of events.
3
|
Explain briefly in your own
words how the Wars of the Roses came to an end.
|
4
|
According to the text, why
did Henry marry Elizabeth of York?
|
5
|
In a paragraph of 50-70
words, summarise the reasons why Richard III is generally thought to have
killed the Princes in the Tower.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments