READING
PASSAGE 2
You
should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-27, which are based on Reading
Passage 1 on the following pages.
Questions 14-18
Reading
Passage 2 contains six Key Points.
Choose
the correct heading for Key Points TWO
to SIX from the list of headings
below.
Write
the correct number, i-viii, in boxes 14-18 on your answer sheet.
List of
Headings
|
i
|
Ensure
the reward system is fair
Match
rewards lo individuals
Ensure
targets are realistic
Link
rewards to achievement
Encourage
managers to take more responsibility
Recognise
changes in employees' performance over time
Establish
targets and give feedback
Ensure
employees are suited to their jobs
|
ii
|
iii
|
iv
|
v
|
vi
|
vii
|
viii
|
Example
Key point One
|
Answer
viii
|
14
|
Key
point Two
|
15
|
Key
point Three
|
16
|
Key
point Four
|
17
|
Key
point Five
|
18
|
Key
point Six
|
Motivating Employees under Adverse
Condition
|
THE
CHALLENGE
It is a great deal easier to
motivate employees in a growing organisation than a declining one. When
organisations are expanding and adding personnel, promotional
opportunities, pay rises, and the excitement of being associated with a
dynamic organisation create Slings of optimism. Management is able ta use
the growth to entice and encourage employees. When an organisation is
shrinking, the best and most mobile workers are prone to leave voluntarily.
Unfortunately, they are the ones the organisation can least afford to lose-
those with me highest skills and experience. The minor employees remain
because their job options are limited.
Morale also surfers during
decline. People fear they may be the next to be made redundant.
Productivity often suffers, as employees spend their time sharing rumours
and providing one another with moral support rather than focusing on their
jobs. For those whose jobs are secure, pay increases are rarely possible.
Pay cuts, unheard of during times of growth, may even be imposed. The
challenge to management is how to motivate employees under such
retrenchment conditions. The ways of meeting this challenge can be broadly
divided into six Key Points, which are outlined below.
|
KEY
POINT ONE
There is an abundance of
evidence to support the motivational benefits that result from carefully
matching people to jobs. For example, if the job is running a small
business or an autonomous unit within a larger business, high achievers
should be sought. However, if the job to be filled is a managerial post in
a large bureaucratic organisation, a candidate who has a high need for
power and a low need for affiliation should be selected. Accordingly, high
achievers should not be put into jobs that are inconsistent with their
needs. High achievers will do best when the job provides moderately
challenging goals and where there is independence and feedback. However, it
should be remembered that not everybody is motivated by jobs that are high
in independence, variety and responsibility.
|
KEY
POINT TWO
The literature on goal-setting
theory suggests that managers should ensure that all employees have
specific goals and receive comments on how well they are doing in those
goals. For those with high achievement needs, typically a minority in any
organisation, the existence of external goals is less important because
high achievers are already internally motivated. The next factor to be
determined is whether the goals should be assigned by a manager or
collectively set in conjunction with the employees. The answer to that
depends on perceptions the culture, however, goals should be assigned. If
participation and the culture are incongruous, employees are likely to
perceive the participation process as manipulative and be negatively
affected by it.
|
KEY
POINT THREE
Regardless of whether goals
are achievable or well within management's perceptions of the employee's
ability, if employees see them as unachievable they will reduce their
effort. Managers must be sure, therefore, that employees feel confident
that their efforts can lead to performance goals. For managers, this means
that employees must have the capability of doing the job and must regard
the appraisal process as valid.
|
KEY
POINT FOUR
Since employees have different
needs, what acts as a reinforcement far one may not for another. Managers
could use their knowledge of each employee to personalise the rewards over
which they have control. Some of the more obvious rewards that managers
allocate include pay, promotions, autonomy, job scope and depth, and the
opportunity lo participate in goal-setting and decision-making.
|
KEY
POINT FIVE
Managers need to make rewards
contingent on performance. To reward factors other than performance will
only reinforce those other factors. Key rewards such as pay increases and
promotions or advancements should be allocated for the attainment of the
employee's specific goals. Consistent with maximising the impact of
rewards, managers should look for ways to increase their visibility.
Eliminating the secrecy surrounding pay by openly communicating everyone's
remuneration, publicising performance bonuses and allocating annual salary
increases in a lump sum rather than spreading them out over an entire year
are examples of actions that will make rewards more visible and potentially
more motivating.
|
KEY
POINT SIX
The way rewards ore
distributed should be transparent so that employees perceive that rewards
or outcomes are equitable and equal to the inputs given. On a simplistic
level, experience, abilities, effort and other obvious inputs should
explain differences in pay, responsibility and other obvious outcomes. The
problem, however, is complicated by the existence of dozens of inputs and
outcomes and by the Fact that employee groups place different degrees of
importance on them. For instance, a study comparing clerical and production
workers identified nearly twenty inputs and outcomes. The clerical workers
considered factors such as quality of work performed and job knowledge near
the top of their list, but these were at the bottom of the production
workers' list. Similarly, production workers thought that the most
important inputs were intelligence and personal involvement with task
accomplishment, two factors that were quite low in the importance ratings
of the clerks. There were also important, though less dramatic, differences
on the outcome side. For example, production workers rated advancement very
highly, whereas clerical workers rated advancement in the lower third of
their list. Such findings suggest that one person's equity is another's
inequity, so an ideal should probably weigh different inputs and outcomes
according to employee group.
|
Questions 19-24
Do
the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage
2?
In
boxes 19-24 on your answer sheet, write:
YES
|
if
the statement agrees with the views of the writer
|
NO
|
if
the statement contradicts with the views of the writer
|
NOT
GIVEN
|
if
it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
|
19
|
A shrinking organisation tends
to lose its less skilled employees rather than its more skilled employees.
It is easier to manage a small
business ban a large business.
High achievers are well-suited
to team work.
Some employees can fee!
manipulated when asked to participate in goal-setting.
The staff appraisal process
should be designed by employees.
Employees' earnings should be
disclosed to everyone within the organisation.
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
Questions 25-27
Look
at the follow groups of worker (Question25-27 )and the list of descriptions
below
Match
each group with the correct description, A-E.
Write
the correct letter, A - E, in boxes 25-27 on your answer sheet.
25
|
high
achievers
clerical
workers
production
workers
|
26
|
27
|
List of Descriptions
|
A
|
They
judge promotion to be important.
They
have less need of external goats.
They
think that the quality of their work is important.
They
resist goals which are imposed.
They
have limited job options.
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you for visiting my blog and for your nice comments